-99.2%
AMC vs TNA
-49.6%
-49.6%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +2.8% | -0.8% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -7.0% | +9.6% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -6.4% | +15.5% | +13.0% |
| 3M | +22.2% | -25.7% | +47.8% | +41.7% |
| 6M | +91.5% | -19.7% | +111.2% | +110.6% |
| YTD | +101.3% | +18.3% | +83.0% | +79.1% |
| 1Y | +20.8% | +24.6% | -3.8% | +3.9% |
| 3Y | -71.3% | +112.8% | -184.1% | -85.9% |
| All | -99.2% | -49.6% | -49.6% | -99.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling