-67.4%
AMC vs RNG
+130.4%
-197.7%
-91.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -3.9% | +8.2% | +5.4% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +5.8% | -3.5% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -0.7% | +19.6% | -20.4% | -5.8% |
| 3M | +35.2% | +67.0% | -31.8% | +15.3% |
| 6M | +124.6% | +88.4% | +36.2% | +83.6% |
| YTD | +69.9% | +155.5% | -85.6% | +23.0% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | +141.7% | -144.2% | -28.4% |
| All | -67.4% | +130.4% | -197.7% | -75.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling