-71.3%
AMC vs NXT
+181.6%
-252.9%
-91.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +5.3% | -3.4% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +32.2% | -29.6% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +21.9% | -12.9% | +6.1% |
| 3M | +22.2% | +6.6% | +15.6% | +20.7% |
| 6M | +91.5% | -16.8% | +108.3% | +93.8% |
| YTD | +101.3% | +20.4% | +80.9% | +89.9% |
| 1Y | +20.8% | -1.5% | +22.3% | +17.1% |
| 3Y | -71.3% | +182.4% | -253.7% | -78.3% |
| All | -71.3% | +181.6% | -252.9% | -78.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling