-80.6%
AMC vs NXT
+98.3%
-178.8%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +1.2% | +3.1% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -1.1% | +3.4% | +2.4% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -15.3% | +14.6% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -43.8% | +79.0% | +46.8% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -18.7% | +143.2% | +125.7% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -3.0% | +72.9% | +64.7% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | +22.7% | -25.3% | -9.9% |
| All | -80.6% | +98.3% | -178.8% | -85.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling