-80.6%
AMC vs LSCC
+20.0%
-100.6%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +1.3% | +1.0% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -9.7% | +8.9% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -23.7% | +58.9% | +41.3% |
| 6M | +124.6% | +26.5% | +98.1% | +109.9% |
| YTD | +69.9% | +57.5% | +12.4% | +50.0% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | +75.7% | -78.3% | -16.7% |
| All | -80.6% | +20.0% | -100.6% | -83.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling