-58.9%
AMC vs LNT
+67.4%
-126.2%
-88.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +0.5% | -3.2% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +3.5% | +1.0% | +2.5% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +12.5% | +9.6% | +2.9% | +12.7% |
| 3M | +23.6% | +5.4% | +18.2% | +23.9% |
| 6M | +144.4% | +3.1% | +141.2% | +144.1% |
| YTD | +108.3% | +16.5% | +91.9% | +102.9% |
| 1Y | +38.9% | +12.3% | +26.6% | +36.6% |
| 3Y | -58.9% | +70.3% | -129.2% | -65.7% |
| All | -58.9% | +67.4% | -126.2% | -65.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling