+40.2%
AMC vs LNT
+13.9%
+26.3%
-63.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.3% | +2.3% | +5.0% | +8.5% |
| 7D | +17.7% | +7.2% | +10.6% | +22.3% |
| 30D | +26.2% | +15.6% | +10.5% | +37.6% |
| 3M | +31.3% | +5.2% | +26.1% | +34.5% |
| 6M | +142.8% | +1.7% | +141.1% | +147.9% |
| YTD | +125.6% | +17.0% | +108.6% | +139.5% |
| 1Y | +40.2% | +14.2% | +26.0% | +51.3% |
| All | +40.2% | +13.9% | +26.3% | +51.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling