-23.9%
AMC vs KRMN
+33.3%
-57.1%
-76.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.3% | +5.7% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -12.3% | +14.6% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -27.5% | +26.7% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -26.5% | +61.7% | +39.4% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -59.6% | +184.1% | +152.4% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -45.4% | +115.2% | +76.4% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | -25.1% | +22.5% | -8.0% |
| All | -23.9% | +33.3% | -57.1% | -36.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling