+6.4%
AMC vs GLXY
-41.9%
+48.3%
-76.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +5.2% | -3.3% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -14.6% | +17.2% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -36.2% | +45.2% | +17.3% |
| 3M | +22.2% | -30.1% | +52.3% | +27.5% |
| 6M | +91.5% | -56.1% | +147.6% | +118.7% |
| YTD | +101.3% | -38.9% | +140.2% | +110.4% |
| 1Y | +20.8% | -55.0% | +75.8% | +33.0% |
| All | +6.4% | -41.9% | +48.3% | +9.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling