-99.2%
AMC vs FLNC
-69.1%
-30.1%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +1.5% | +2.9% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -4.9% | +7.2% | +3.4% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -27.3% | +26.5% | +6.1% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -61.9% | +97.1% | +63.8% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -34.5% | +159.1% | +132.0% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -47.7% | +117.5% | +79.1% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | +53.3% | -55.9% | -27.2% |
| 3Y | -79.8% | -62.4% | -17.4% | -81.5% |
| All | -99.2% | -69.1% | -30.1% | -99.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling