-80.6%
AMC vs DECK
-3.0%
-77.6%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +1.6% | +2.8% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -2.2% | +4.5% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -13.6% | +12.8% | +2.8% |
| 3M | +35.2% | -21.2% | +56.5% | +42.9% |
| 6M | +124.6% | -21.1% | +145.7% | +136.9% |
| YTD | +69.9% | -17.2% | +87.1% | +76.5% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | -30.7% | +28.2% | +4.6% |
| All | -80.6% | -3.0% | -77.6% | -81.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling