-58.9%
AMC vs BTG
+82.1%
-140.9%
-88.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -1.0% | -1.7% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +3.5% | -9.1% | +12.6% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +12.5% | -1.6% | +14.1% | +12.5% |
| 3M | +23.6% | -2.8% | +26.4% | +23.7% |
| 6M | +144.4% | -7.6% | +152.0% | +145.1% |
| YTD | +108.3% | +10.2% | +98.1% | +104.3% |
| 1Y | +38.9% | +21.3% | +17.6% | +35.1% |
| 3Y | -58.9% | +82.7% | -141.5% | -60.6% |
| All | -58.9% | +82.1% | -140.9% | -60.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling