-57.7%
AMC vs BLDR
-51.2%
-6.6%
-88.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -3.6% | +1.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +8.4% | -8.2% | +16.7% | +11.4% |
| 30D | +9.2% | +16.3% | -7.1% | +3.7% |
| 3M | +32.0% | -17.0% | +49.0% | +39.6% |
| 6M | +149.3% | -17.4% | +166.6% | +160.0% |
| YTD | +114.1% | -41.6% | +155.7% | +149.2% |
| 1Y | +35.8% | -43.5% | +79.3% | +59.1% |
| All | -57.7% | -51.2% | -6.6% | -49.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling