-71.3%
AMC vs BLDR
-50.4%
-20.9%
-91.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -4.5% | +6.5% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -3.7% | +6.3% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +16.8% | -7.8% | +3.4% |
| 3M | +22.2% | -13.7% | +35.9% | +27.5% |
| 6M | +91.5% | -21.9% | +113.3% | +103.7% |
| YTD | +101.3% | -39.2% | +140.5% | +131.4% |
| 1Y | +20.8% | -42.6% | +63.4% | +40.6% |
| 3Y | -71.3% | -50.2% | -21.1% | -68.4% |
| All | -71.3% | -50.4% | -20.9% | -68.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling