+71.6%
AMAT vs ZTS
-29.9%
+101.5%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | +0.5% | -4.0% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +19.3% | +1.0% | +18.3% | +19.3% |
| 30D | -17.9% | +12.4% | -30.4% | -15.8% |
| 3M | -30.4% | +13.6% | -44.0% | -28.4% |
| 6M | -11.4% | +9.3% | -20.8% | -8.9% |
| YTD | +48.8% | -32.6% | +81.3% | +77.2% |
| All | +71.6% | -29.9% | +101.5% | +102.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling