+170.1%
AMAT vs RGTI
+1,038.3%
-868.2%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGTI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -8.6% | +14.6% | +7.0% |
| 7D | +7.0% | -0.9% | +7.8% | +7.0% |
| 30D | -20.6% | -16.2% | -4.4% | -19.2% |
| 3M | -24.8% | -38.6% | +13.8% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -10.7% | -45.8% | +35.1% | -6.2% |
| YTD | +54.3% | -49.8% | +104.1% | +61.8% |
| 1Y | +73.7% | -64.6% | +138.3% | +86.3% |
| All | +170.1% | +1,038.3% | -868.2% | +82.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGTI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGTI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGTI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGTI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling