+203.0%
AMAT vs PFGC
+60.5%
+142.5%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -0.5% | +4.8% | +4.5% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -2.2% | +0.7% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -11.9% | -2.9% | -11.2% |
| 3M | -9.3% | +5.0% | -14.3% | -12.9% |
| 6M | +27.4% | +8.6% | +18.8% | +20.1% |
| YTD | +77.6% | +9.7% | +67.9% | +66.2% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | -6.3% | +195.2% | +189.3% |
| All | +203.0% | +60.5% | +142.5% | +150.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling