+203.0%
AMAT vs ONDS
+685.6%
-482.5%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONDS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -0.1% | +4.4% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -3.5% | +2.0% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -14.1% | -0.7% | -13.9% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -36.3% | +27.1% | -6.5% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -27.5% | +54.9% | +29.1% |
| YTD | +77.6% | -21.9% | +99.5% | +78.0% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | +43.0% | +146.0% | +174.1% |
| All | +203.0% | +685.6% | -482.5% | +134.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONDS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONDS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONDS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONDS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling