+203.0%
AMAT vs NIO
-64.6%
+267.6%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.6% | +5.9% | +4.5% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -13.0% | +11.5% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -18.3% | +3.5% | -12.6% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -33.2% | +23.9% | -4.5% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -21.5% | +48.9% | +30.6% |
| YTD | +77.6% | -25.5% | +103.1% | +82.8% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | -38.0% | +227.0% | +202.7% |
| All | +203.0% | -64.6% | +267.6% | +222.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling