+203.0%
AMAT vs MSTR
+306.3%
-103.2%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.4% | +5.7% | +4.5% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +12.2% | -13.7% | -3.3% |
| 30D | -14.8% | +45.2% | -60.0% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -9.3% | +10.4% | -19.7% | -11.4% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -2.5% | +29.9% | +25.8% |
| YTD | +77.6% | -6.0% | +83.6% | +74.1% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | -56.4% | +245.4% | +211.7% |
| All | +203.0% | +306.3% | -103.2% | +164.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling