+203.0%
AMAT vs MET
+65.9%
+137.1%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.6% | +5.9% | +4.9% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +1.2% | -2.7% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -14.8% | +1.4% | -16.2% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -9.3% | +17.7% | -27.0% | -15.9% |
| 6M | +27.4% | +35.0% | -7.6% | +10.4% |
| YTD | +77.6% | +26.3% | +51.3% | +58.0% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | +22.8% | +166.1% | +159.3% |
| All | +203.0% | +65.9% | +137.1% | +136.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling