+203.0%
AMAT vs LEN
-24.6%
+227.6%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.0% | +5.3% | +4.6% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -3.2% | +1.7% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -4.9% | -9.9% | -13.7% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -8.5% | -0.8% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -20.7% | +48.1% | +34.9% |
| YTD | +77.6% | -17.4% | +95.0% | +85.2% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | -38.2% | +227.2% | +225.1% |
| All | +203.0% | -24.6% | +227.6% | +186.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling