+203.0%
AMAT vs IBM
+74.2%
+128.8%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IBM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +0.1% | +4.2% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -0.3% | -1.2% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -14.8% | +0.3% | -15.1% | -14.9% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -21.6% | +12.3% | -6.0% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -4.7% | +32.1% | +23.0% |
| YTD | +77.6% | -19.1% | +96.7% | +82.3% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | -2.5% | +191.4% | +168.1% |
| All | +203.0% | +74.2% | +128.8% | +100.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling