-22.2%
AMAT vs GTLB
+100.0%
-122.2%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -1.8% | +6.1% | +4.0% |
| 7D | -14.7% | -11.1% | -3.6% | -16.1% |
| 30D | -36.1% | -7.5% | -28.6% | -36.1% |
| 3M | -36.9% | +34.8% | -71.6% | -29.1% |
| 6M | -22.2% | +98.0% | -120.2% | -2.2% |
| All | -22.2% | +100.0% | -122.2% | -2.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling