+153.1%
AMAT vs ENTG
+52.9%
+100.2%
-55.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -1.1% | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -9.3% | +6.8% | +4.3% |
| 30D | -26.5% | -16.4% | -10.2% | -17.6% |
| 3M | -28.6% | -3.8% | -24.7% | -27.3% |
| 6M | -14.2% | -6.9% | -7.3% | -11.6% |
| YTD | +45.5% | +65.0% | -19.5% | +4.1% |
| 1Y | +59.3% | +61.7% | -2.3% | +14.7% |
| 3Y | +153.1% | +46.6% | +106.5% | +87.2% |
| All | +153.1% | +52.9% | +100.2% | +87.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling