+203.0%
AMAT vs EBAY
+142.2%
+60.9%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -2.3% | +6.6% | +4.5% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -2.1% | +0.6% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -6.7% | -8.1% | -14.2% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -5.0% | -4.3% | -9.1% |
| 6M | +27.4% | +14.6% | +12.8% | +23.6% |
| YTD | +77.6% | +19.8% | +57.8% | +71.1% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | +12.6% | +176.4% | +179.6% |
| All | +203.0% | +142.2% | +60.9% | +141.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling