+202.3%
AMAT vs BIYA
-99.8%
+302.0%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -1.7% | +6.1% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +1.3% | -2.9% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -21.0% | +6.2% | -15.0% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -74.3% | +65.0% | -9.7% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -84.6% | +112.0% | +27.6% |
| YTD | +77.6% | -94.2% | +171.7% | +80.6% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | -98.2% | +287.2% | +200.9% |
| All | +202.3% | -99.8% | +302.0% | +218.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling