+227.2%
AMAT vs BBIO
+167.2%
+59.9%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +1.8% | -2.6% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +6.9% | -0.5% | +7.5% | +7.0% |
| 30D | -10.1% | -10.1% | 0.0% | -8.5% |
| 3M | -6.0% | +12.4% | -18.4% | -8.0% |
| 6M | +38.6% | +15.9% | +22.7% | +34.7% |
| YTD | +83.1% | -0.5% | +83.6% | +81.2% |
| 1Y | +188.3% | +42.2% | +146.1% | +168.7% |
| All | +227.2% | +167.2% | +59.9% | +166.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling