+400.4%
ALAB vs ZTS
-54.5%
+454.9%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.8% | -0.6% | +10.4% | +9.8% |
| 7D | +7.2% | -2.0% | +9.2% | +7.3% |
| 30D | -2.5% | +1.9% | -4.4% | -2.7% |
| 3M | -13.3% | -4.0% | -9.3% | -12.9% |
| 6M | +172.8% | -39.1% | +212.0% | +203.7% |
| YTD | +86.6% | -38.8% | +125.4% | +107.2% |
| 1Y | +65.2% | -49.6% | +114.7% | +94.2% |
| All | +400.4% | -54.5% | +454.9% | +419.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling