+400.4%
ALAB vs NIO
-25.6%
+426.0%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.8% | -1.6% | +11.3% | +10.2% |
| 7D | +7.2% | -13.0% | +20.3% | +11.2% |
| 30D | -2.5% | -18.3% | +15.8% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -13.3% | -33.2% | +19.9% | -3.7% |
| 6M | +172.8% | -21.5% | +194.3% | +185.5% |
| YTD | +86.6% | -25.5% | +112.1% | +97.8% |
| 1Y | +65.2% | -38.0% | +103.2% | +83.3% |
| All | +400.4% | -25.6% | +426.0% | +346.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling