+400.4%
ALAB vs LNT
+51.1%
+349.3%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.8% | 0.0% | +9.8% | +9.7% |
| 7D | +7.2% | -0.1% | +7.3% | +7.1% |
| 30D | -2.5% | -3.2% | +0.7% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -13.3% | -4.1% | -9.2% | -15.4% |
| 6M | +172.8% | -4.6% | +177.4% | +164.9% |
| YTD | +86.6% | +7.0% | +79.6% | +96.0% |
| 1Y | +65.2% | +8.3% | +56.9% | +75.9% |
| All | +400.4% | +51.1% | +349.3% | +698.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling