+0.9%
AKAM vs NIO
-62.3%
+63.2%
-46.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -0.3% | +0.6% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -6.7% | +5.9% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -20.0% | +15.6% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -25.6% | -30.5% | +4.9% | -23.7% |
| 6M | +5.7% | -20.7% | +26.4% | +7.2% |
| YTD | +21.0% | -25.7% | +46.7% | +23.0% |
| 1Y | +33.9% | -38.6% | +72.5% | +37.0% |
| 3Y | +0.9% | -62.3% | +63.1% | +1.1% |
| All | +0.9% | -62.3% | +63.2% | +1.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling