+34.8%
AIG vs LNT
+46.9%
-12.1%
-17.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -1.0% | -0.1% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -4.2% | +3.2% | +0.4% |
| 3M | +0.7% | -6.7% | +7.4% | +3.0% |
| 6M | -2.2% | -3.6% | +1.4% | -1.1% |
| YTD | -10.8% | +5.9% | -16.7% | -13.0% |
| 1Y | -2.0% | +7.3% | -9.3% | -4.9% |
| 3Y | +34.8% | +46.5% | -11.6% | +20.3% |
| All | +34.8% | +46.9% | -12.1% | +20.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling