+266.4%
AG vs GLDM
+128.8%
+137.7%
-53.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -0.9% | -1.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -0.5% | +1.5% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +19.2% | +4.4% | +14.8% | +10.0% |
| 3M | +6.2% | -1.1% | +7.2% | +10.9% |
| 6M | -26.7% | -13.7% | -13.0% | +1.7% |
| YTD | +26.1% | +2.8% | +23.4% | +25.4% |
| 1Y | +131.7% | +24.8% | +106.8% | +56.6% |
| All | +266.4% | +128.8% | +137.7% | -41.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling