+221.8%
AFRM vs LNT
+50.5%
+171.3%
-55.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | 0.0% | -2.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -7.0% | -0.1% | -6.9% | -6.9% |
| 30D | -7.8% | -3.2% | -4.6% | -6.5% |
| 3M | +5.3% | -4.1% | +9.4% | +7.0% |
| 6M | +42.6% | -4.6% | +47.2% | +44.8% |
| YTD | -2.8% | +7.0% | -9.8% | -8.9% |
| 1Y | -19.3% | +8.3% | -27.6% | -25.3% |
| All | +221.8% | +50.5% | +171.3% | +114.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling