+229.9%
AFRM vs LDOS
+39.7%
+190.2%
-55.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | +0.5% | -3.1% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -7.0% | -5.4% | -1.5% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -7.8% | +4.9% | -12.7% | -9.6% |
| 3M | +5.3% | +7.2% | -1.9% | +2.0% |
| 6M | +42.6% | -24.2% | +66.9% | +60.0% |
| YTD | -2.8% | -25.8% | +23.0% | +9.7% |
| 1Y | -19.3% | -24.7% | +5.4% | -9.6% |
| All | +229.9% | +39.7% | +190.2% | +144.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling