+68.4%
AFL vs PENG
+101.4%
-33.0%
-13.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +6.4% | -7.4% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +4.5% | -4.0% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -6.2% | -7.1% | +0.9% | -6.1% |
| 3M | +2.2% | -27.3% | +29.4% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +5.3% | +169.6% | -164.3% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +8.0% | +164.6% | -156.7% | +4.6% |
| 1Y | +10.2% | +109.5% | -99.2% | +7.3% |
| All | +68.4% | +101.4% | -33.0% | +62.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling