+9.8%
AFL vs BIYA
-99.8%
+109.6%
-12.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | 0.0% | -1.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.7% | +2.7% | -3.5% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -7.1% | -18.7% | +11.6% | -7.0% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -72.0% | +72.5% | +0.8% |
| 6M | +4.5% | -86.4% | +90.9% | +4.6% |
| YTD | +6.1% | -94.2% | +100.2% | +6.2% |
| 1Y | +10.6% | -98.4% | +109.0% | +10.9% |
| All | +9.8% | -99.8% | +109.6% | +9.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling