+76.6%
AEP vs SCHG
+86.3%
-9.6%
-13.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +0.9% | -1.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -1.0% | +0.1% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -1.3% | +0.2% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -3.3% | +5.4% | -8.7% | -2.8% |
| 6M | -4.6% | +14.4% | -19.1% | -3.8% |
| YTD | +9.4% | +8.0% | +1.4% | +10.1% |
| 1Y | +16.9% | +12.7% | +4.2% | +18.0% |
| 3Y | +76.6% | +85.6% | -9.0% | +63.9% |
| All | +76.6% | +86.3% | -9.6% | +63.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling