+80.5%
AEP vs GLDM
+121.8%
-41.2%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.8% | +0.6% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +4.7% | -7.5% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -0.9% | +4.5% | +3.7% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -4.3% | +6.1% | +2.3% |
| 6M | -3.1% | -13.4% | +10.3% | -1.0% |
| YTD | +12.2% | -5.8% | +18.1% | +11.6% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | +2.1% | +7.1% | +6.3% |
| 3Y | +77.9% | +105.0% | -27.1% | +39.2% |
| All | +80.5% | +121.8% | -41.2% | +34.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling