+91.2%
AEP vs GIS
-38.9%
+130.1%
-14.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +2.4% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -3.4% | +6.2% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +3.2% | +6.9% | -3.7% | +1.5% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -10.1% | +13.9% | +5.9% |
| 6M | +2.5% | +5.9% | -3.3% | -0.2% |
| YTD | +15.5% | -21.1% | +36.6% | +21.3% |
| 1Y | +9.6% | -22.5% | +32.1% | +15.7% |
| 3Y | +91.2% | -39.0% | +130.1% | +120.6% |
| All | +91.2% | -38.9% | +130.1% | +120.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling