+355.6%
AEM vs DECK
-3.0%
+358.6%
-45.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +1.6% | -2.7% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -2.2% | +1.7% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +24.0% | -13.6% | +37.6% | +24.2% |
| 3M | +16.1% | -21.2% | +37.3% | +16.3% |
| 6M | -11.6% | -21.1% | +9.5% | -11.6% |
| YTD | +21.5% | -17.2% | +38.8% | +22.1% |
| 1Y | +39.2% | -30.7% | +69.9% | +40.2% |
| All | +355.6% | -3.0% | +358.6% | +341.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling