+330.6%
AEM vs BHP
+72.0%
+258.7%
-45.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -5.3% | +2.4% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -3.7% | -1.3% | -2.9% |
| 30D | +8.5% | -0.8% | +9.3% | +9.2% |
| 3M | +29.3% | +7.6% | +21.7% | +24.1% |
| 6M | -12.9% | +20.8% | -33.7% | -21.4% |
| YTD | +16.8% | +50.8% | -34.0% | -4.4% |
| 1Y | +29.8% | +70.9% | -41.1% | +0.4% |
| All | +330.6% | +72.0% | +258.7% | +231.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling