+184.2%
AEIS vs UMAC
+549.5%
-365.3%
-39.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | +9.3% | -6.6% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +8.1% | +14.7% | -6.6% | +7.1% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -0.5% | -10.6% | -11.5% |
| 3M | -5.6% | +0.5% | -6.2% | -6.6% |
| 6M | -0.6% | +57.9% | -58.6% | -5.6% |
| YTD | +38.0% | +103.9% | -65.9% | +28.7% |
| 1Y | +87.2% | +159.3% | -72.0% | +71.2% |
| All | +184.2% | +549.5% | -365.3% | +140.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling