+98.2%
AEHR vs ONTO
+113.5%
-15.3%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ONTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -1.0% | +6.2% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +19.1% | +9.4% | +9.7% | +11.0% |
| 30D | -10.0% | -4.4% | -5.6% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +1.3% | +1.6% | -0.3% | +3.6% |
| 6M | +133.8% | +45.3% | +88.5% | +93.9% |
| YTD | +373.3% | +76.4% | +296.9% | +257.4% |
| 1Y | +256.2% | +167.2% | +89.0% | +113.9% |
| All | +98.2% | +113.5% | -15.3% | -2.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ONTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ONTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ONTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ONTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling