+98.2%
AEHR vs NXT
+89.5%
+8.6%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -3.6% | +8.9% | +7.1% |
| 7D | +19.1% | -0.2% | +19.3% | +19.1% |
| 30D | -10.0% | -20.0% | +9.9% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +1.3% | -30.9% | +32.3% | +24.5% |
| 6M | +133.8% | -23.8% | +157.6% | +174.3% |
| YTD | +373.3% | -5.4% | +378.7% | +412.7% |
| 1Y | +256.2% | +28.0% | +228.1% | +247.4% |
| All | +98.2% | +89.5% | +8.6% | +38.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling