+329.0%
AEHR vs FLNC
-70.4%
+399.4%
-87.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +2.5% | -1.5% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +9.8% | -4.1% | +13.8% | +11.1% |
| 30D | -26.7% | -24.8% | -2.0% | -18.7% |
| 3M | -8.1% | -59.1% | +51.0% | +29.1% |
| 6M | +123.1% | -42.0% | +165.0% | +156.4% |
| YTD | +369.0% | -49.8% | +418.8% | +445.2% |
| 1Y | +256.4% | +43.1% | +213.3% | +169.0% |
| 3Y | +96.4% | -61.0% | +157.3% | +90.5% |
| All | +329.0% | -70.4% | +399.4% | +294.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling