+49.6%
ADM vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+148.9%
-31.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +2.6% | -2.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -29.7% | +33.5% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +9.8% | -65.3% | +75.0% | +9.4% |
| 3M | +2.1% | -57.3% | +59.5% | +2.1% |
| 6M | +27.5% | -61.6% | +89.1% | +27.5% |
| YTD | +50.2% | -78.3% | +128.5% | +49.9% |
| 1Y | +40.6% | -30.2% | +70.8% | +42.0% |
| All | +49.6% | -99.3% | +148.9% | +32.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling