-56.1%
ADBE vs GTLB
-47.1%
-9.0%
-71.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | +1.1% | -7.8% | -7.0% |
| 7D | -8.6% | +11.1% | -19.6% | -11.0% |
| 30D | +2.8% | +37.8% | -35.0% | -4.9% |
| 3M | +3.1% | +61.6% | -58.4% | -8.0% |
| 6M | -2.4% | +98.9% | -101.3% | -17.2% |
| YTD | -23.9% | +32.8% | -56.6% | -30.0% |
| 1Y | -22.6% | +14.7% | -37.3% | -27.2% |
| 3Y | -52.7% | +1.3% | -54.0% | -56.6% |
| All | -56.1% | -47.1% | -9.0% | -59.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling