+76.8%
ACWI vs NIO
-64.6%
+141.4%
-16.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.6% | +1.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -13.0% | +13.5% | +1.5% |
| 30D | +0.9% | -18.3% | +19.1% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +2.4% | -33.2% | +35.6% | +5.3% |
| 6M | +12.4% | -21.5% | +33.9% | +13.9% |
| YTD | +15.2% | -25.5% | +40.7% | +17.0% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | -38.0% | +60.7% | +25.9% |
| All | +76.8% | -64.6% | +141.4% | +81.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling