+34.0%
ACWI vs KRMN
+33.3%
+0.7%
-16.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.3% | +1.3% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -12.3% | +12.8% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +0.9% | -27.5% | +28.3% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +2.4% | -26.5% | +28.9% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +12.4% | -59.6% | +71.9% | +22.3% |
| YTD | +15.2% | -45.4% | +60.5% | +19.4% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | -25.1% | +47.8% | +20.3% |
| All | +34.0% | +33.3% | +0.7% | +12.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling