+76.8%
ACWI vs BLDR
-55.3%
+132.1%
-16.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +2.5% | -2.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -2.8% | +3.3% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +0.9% | -13.3% | +14.1% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +2.4% | -12.3% | +14.7% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +12.4% | -31.5% | +43.8% | +17.8% |
| YTD | +15.2% | -36.1% | +51.2% | +21.4% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | -54.1% | +76.8% | +35.8% |
| All | +76.8% | -55.3% | +132.1% | +84.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling